The RW Takeaway: The breakout sophomore Axon surprised our editors and testers alike with its smooth ride, plush hugs-your-foot upper, and incredible low price.

  • Speedroll design (similar to the Endorphin racing series) promotes quick turnover
  • Pwrrun midsole provides a bouncy ride with cushioned support
  • Overall, a solid daily trainer capable long runs, tempos, and easy runs

Price: $100
Type:
Road
Weight:
9.6 oz (M), 8.5 oz (W)
Drop:
4 mm

Buy Men’s Buy Women’s More Images

More From Runner's World
 
preview for HDM All Sections Playlist - Runners World US

Saucony Axon 2

Axon 2

Saucony Axon 2

Now 35% Off
$65 at Amazon
Credit: Lakota Gambill
Pros
  • Soft, supportive midsole foam provides cushioned ride
  • Affordable price for a workhorse trainer
Cons
  • Slightly narrow toebox according to widefoot testers

We test hundreds of shoes every year but can’t possibly get to every single model. One that didn’t make it through our lab last year was the debut Axon. So I was both delighted and puzzled to test the second version. This bargain buy—truly, how is this shoe only $100?—looks and feels maximally cushioned, but it’s shockingly lightweight and compels you to stride for race pace.

Responsive Pwrrun Midsole

The Axon’s thick Pwrrun midsole has plenty of bounce, while a slightly curved profile (think Saucony’s cambered Speedroll design, minus the carbon-fiber plate) smooths transitions onto the forefoot during turnover. That combination explains why the shoe’s low 4mm offset goes unnoticed midrun.

saucony axon 2More Photos
The Axon has Speedroll tech, a rocker design that helps quicken your pace.
Lakota Gambill

“While there is not a ‘perfect’ shoe, the Axon 2 comes darn close for me,” said a tester who also ran in New Balance’s $100 FuelCell Propel v3 and found the midsole a bit too firm for concrete sidewalks. “The Axon had the perfect amount of bounce and cushioning on a variety of surfaces.” He ran along Florida’s soft, sandy coastline—“like running in thick baby powder”—to test the shoe’s stability. The Axon passed this test with aplomb.

Best of all: This budget shoe has proven remarkably durable in our testing. “Its durability reminds me of Asics’s GT series,” said one tester who wears a women’s size 11. “I’ve run over 200 miles and there is barely any wear on them.”

saucony axon 2More Photos
The carbon rubber outsole was a divisive feature; some testers found it grippy while others desired more wet-surface traction.
Lakota Gambill

Wear-Tester Notes

Giancarlo A. | Tester since 2020
Arch: Medium | Gait: Neutral | Footstrike: Midfoot

“This is a great shoe for the average runner! It checks all the boxes. Depending on the online retailer, the price point is $80 to $100, which puts it at a comfortable price for many. I enjoyed the ultra-padded midsole and heel. It provided a super comfortable ride! The upper mesh and toebox felt a bit cramped and I think I would’ve benefited from sizing up. My runs were all on pavement and most recently I put a few miles on a treadmill. I tried to pace myself at 5:30 per mile with short sprints thrown in for a bit of interval training—I’m a soccer player.”

Holly M. | Tester since 2021
Arch: Medium | Gait: Neutral | Footstrike: Midfoot

“This was my first experience with a ‘rocker’ style sole. After trying this shoe out, my biggest disappointment was that I’ve avoided this shoe type for so long. I felt like the Axon provided an easy propulsion forward—almost like the shoe version of those conveyor pathways found at the airport. I’ve never loved running on sidewalks so much; this shoe brought extra energy to a usually boring terrain. I mainly ran at a pace of 8:30 to 9:00 per mile with this shoe. However, I did run less on trails and slanted road shoulders after noticing that I seemed at high risk of rolling an ankle when on uneven terrain. This was my first experience with Saucony running shoes and I will certainly be looking at the brand further in the future after such an enjoyable first experience. Although the shoe wasn’t ideal for all terrains, this is one of the first shoes in which I thoroughly enjoyed running on hard surfaces.”

Headshot of Amanda Furrer
Amanda Furrer
Test Editor

Amanda is a test editor at Runner’s World who has run the Boston Marathon every year since 2013; she's a former professional baker with a master’s in gastronomy and she carb-loads on snickerdoodles.